<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Biomolecules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>News and views about small biomolecules regulating life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter by ashgene</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/twitter/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>ashgene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Oh am in twitter too for the same reason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh am in twitter too for the same reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Error bars by Ahamarshan</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/error-bars/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahamarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Wavv this is what I need! Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wavv this is what I need! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zotero by Ahamarshan</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/zotero/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahamarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-70</guid>
		<description>cool tool !, I found this quite useful. I use Refworks and endnote.   It looks like this has a lot more useful features.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool tool !, I found this quite useful. I use Refworks and endnote.   It looks like this has a lot more useful features.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Youtube for scientific publications by sdf</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/youtube-for-scientific-publications/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>sdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/youtube-for-scientific-publications/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>3R2WR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3R2WR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Youtube for scientific publications by ashgene</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/youtube-for-scientific-publications/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>ashgene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/youtube-for-scientific-publications/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Very interesting find. Thanks
-ash#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting find. Thanks<br />
-ash#</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting Bio links by Deepak</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/interesting-bio-links/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/interesting-bio-links/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thank you for mentioning Bioscreencast.  Our hope is that it becomes a lot more than a database, but rather a site where users share their screencasts and help facilitate research and curiosity among their peers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for mentioning Bioscreencast.  Our hope is that it becomes a lot more than a database, but rather a site where users share their screencasts and help facilitate research and curiosity among their peers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Rama</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/about/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Rama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Vidhya,

               Welcome. I look forward to your posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vidhya,</p>
<p>               Welcome. I look forward to your posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting Bio links by Hari Jayaram</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/interesting-bio-links/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Hari Jayaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/interesting-bio-links/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Vidhya,
Glad you liked bioscreencast.com. We definitely want scientists such as ourselves to use the site to learn from each other. We would be thrilled if you could submit some requests or better yet screencast to share your knowldege with others.
If you need any help screencasting drop us a line.Bioinformatics and computational biology are definitely two broad areas that lend themselves to knowledge dissemination via the medium of screencasting..
So we look forward to your screencasts on our site.
Thanks for your post
Hari Jayaram
Bioscreencast.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vidhya,<br />
Glad you liked bioscreencast.com. We definitely want scientists such as ourselves to use the site to learn from each other. We would be thrilled if you could submit some requests or better yet screencast to share your knowldege with others.<br />
If you need any help screencasting drop us a line.Bioinformatics and computational biology are definitely two broad areas that lend themselves to knowledge dissemination via the medium of screencasting..<br />
So we look forward to your screencasts on our site.<br />
Thanks for your post<br />
Hari Jayaram<br />
Bioscreencast.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simpler origin of life by Ahamarshan</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/simpler-origin-of-life/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahamarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/simpler-origin-of-life/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I feel he could only imply life as a thermodynamic state but define it seems sort of over ambitious way to push ideas.  Hope Celera &#38; Craig doesnt go about hunting for this RNA molecule to patent it.  
and btw whats a Gold Scenario ? &#38; yeah the Watchmaker could be Blind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel he could only imply life as a thermodynamic state but define it seems sort of over ambitious way to push ideas.  Hope Celera &amp; Craig doesnt go about hunting for this RNA molecule to patent it.<br />
and btw whats a Gold Scenario ? &amp; yeah the Watchmaker could be Blind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Science and religion by Ahamarshan</title>
		<link>http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/5/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahamarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomolecules.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/5/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Reading through these parts of the interview I felt that Dawkins is more of swearing and accusing theologist than giving any definitive No to the presence or absence of any godly excistence. I feel the whole idea of God is subsidized when it comes to intellectual debates like this. Dawkins, I guess is equally disturbed and unfounded in his ideas and theories of God's non-existence than as Krauss is when he putforth the possibility of a Godly involvement inside the dynamics of this universe or beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading through these parts of the interview I felt that Dawkins is more of swearing and accusing theologist than giving any definitive No to the presence or absence of any godly excistence. I feel the whole idea of God is subsidized when it comes to intellectual debates like this. Dawkins, I guess is equally disturbed and unfounded in his ideas and theories of God&#8217;s non-existence than as Krauss is when he putforth the possibility of a Godly involvement inside the dynamics of this universe or beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
